Monday 23 October 2017

Tutorial with Simon

When discussing the overarching theme of my critical report it was discussed that there should be more of a focus upon what women bring to visual culture. This being further embedded with a discussion upon who makes design aimed at females, and whether the user is being represented well enough. This applying to popular culture.


When discussing the outcome, it became evident that for myself to develop an editorial, it is essential that the report has some form of underlying mention of this topic. When discussing this further with Simon it became apparent that feminism within editorials may be a strong focus of the essay. Embedding elements of representation, identity loss and patriarchal preferences. This may also allow myself to reference key characteristics previously mentioned.



Areas to research:


  • Producers/ readers of magazines
  • magazine audiences
  • Esquire-international women's day
  • David Gaunlet- Media, gender and identity
  • Rosalin Gill 
  • Diva magazine/GQ/Mushpit 
  • Male magazines compared to Female magazines
  • Feminist magazines 


Essay plan

What is the role of women within graphic design
What is the female designer's role within graphic design?
The women addressing gender imbalance in graphic design



The aim of this paper is to highlight key injustices within the design industry in which discriminate against females. Statistics may be drawn to gather this information in which spotlights trends and limitations of the female designer. The reasoning behind this will be discussed in a contemporary light, as well as considering contextual and biological implications.


Dissertation Plan


Introduction

What is feminism?
What is design?
How do they interlink?


The struggle of women to get into the design industry
2nd wave of feminism overview?
Paula Scher’s Burst into the design industry-postmodern values

Statistics- women in the design industry then?
Case study- women in the design industry now
Uni stats

Why is there this indifference?

Exposure etc..
Biology


Contemporary female designers gaining recognition-how are they changing design

When will there be a balance? discussed...

Conclusion


Thursday 19 October 2017

Contemporary female designers


Susan Kare











Susan Kare is a hugely significant figure in icon design, having designed internationally recognizable symbols for Apple, Microsoft, and PayPal.


Candy Chang
















Taiwanese-American artist Candy Chang enters the public sphere with her designs. In the example above she creates a masterful composition displaying deep understanding of proportion and public space.



Scarlett Duba 






















Scarlett Duba, senior designer at Pirtle Design, is a force in the print design world. Among other clients, she has done countless covers for Vassar, which feature concise and well executed concepts.



Teresa Sdralevich



















Teresa Sdralevich, freelance poster cover designer from Brussels, perhaps could be said to have picked up where Saul Bass left off, using bold shapes and color pallets that are imperfect and carry a human element.


Fanette Mellier




















Fanette Mellier is another female designer coming from the realm of silk screen. As you can see above, her prints are immaculate, and quite simply mind blowing. The sheer intention and perfection in execution is jaw dropping and deeply inspiring.


Laura Pol
















Creator of her own visual language, Laura Pol is a true perfectionist in the realm of print design and layout. Notice her sideways captions penetrating into the geometric images; a unique and excellent touch.

Are Females Ruling the Design Industry?

https://heydesign.com/2016/07/female-logo-designers-who-changed-industry/



Rebecca Wright, Programme Director of Graphic Communication Design at Central Saint Martins, University of the Arts London and a writer from It’s Nice That has given her opinion on the lack of female identity within the design industry:

“This female domination in graphic design education appears to be reversed when it comes to the graphic design industry.”




The Famous Nike Design by Carolyn Davidson


Some of the world’s most recognisable logo designs have been designed by women. Female designers need to be reminded that they are certainly a strong influence in the design industry.

Carolyn Davidson designed the famous Nike “Swoosh” back in 1971 and at the time she was a graphic design student. At the time Carolyn was only looking to earn some extra cash and could never have imagined it’s success. Business Logo Designer, Repeat Logo, has graced the Nike logo in their list of top ten corporate logos ever! They stated that the “The Nike “swoosh” represents the movement of a runner as they jump off the ground.”

Once Carolyn Davidson graduated she continued her work in design as a freelance designer. Initially Carolyn was paid $35 for her work on the Nike logo! Since then she has been given shares in the brand that are now worth $1 million.

Carolyn’s work for Nike is just an example of how a simple piece worth $35. This shows how a female can take-over in a male dominated market like the sports design industry.

The Chanel Logo by Coco Chanel


Chanel is a brand that is adored by female fashion fans from Paris to New York. The timeless, black and white, Chanel CC logo was designed by Gabrielle “Coco” Chanel in 1925.

Coco Chanel wasn’t a graphic designer by trade. However, she did have impeccable eye for fashion design.It can definitely be said that Chanel changed the Industry with her simplistic logo design. Many believe that the Chanel CC logo was based on Coco and her co-founder Arthur Capel’s initials. There is debate surrounding this as some Chanel followers argue that it was inspired by Château Crémat . Coco Chanel grew up by a Château Crémat in Nice and it can be argued that the design was inspired by stained glass at the Château.








Female Designers: Ones to Watch


On the bright side there are now more female creative students than ever! In a 2013 Guardian survey it was reported that out of 12,930 students at the University of the Arts London, 9370 were female – that works out at a heavy 72.5%.

Furthermore, 61% of students that studied creative arts in UK Higher Education in the UK, were women, great news but where are all of these female designers going?



Anna Kuts

New York based designer, Anna, has been named one as one of Top 26 Women Designers Working Today. Anna is a graphic designer that specialises in logo design, visual identity, poster, packaging, exhibition and editorial design. She has worked as a freelancer since 2009 and graduated this year in Graphic Design.



Women at the drawing board

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/07/arts/07iht-design07.html


Design has been a man’s world since the Industrial Revolution. Even in the 20th century, the few successful women tended to work with male collaborators, who usually overshadowed them. Take Lilly Reich, the principal designer of most of the furniture routinely attributed to Mies Van Der Rohe. Or Charlotte Perriand, who was relegated to a similar supporting role with Le Corbusier and her lover Edouard Jeanneret. The same fate befell Ray Eames, wife of the more famous Charles.


Have things changed? Yes and no. One significant shift is in numbers. Most top design schools now have a majority of female students — 68 percent at the Rhode Island School of Design in the United States and 54 percent at Design Academy Eindhoven in the Netherlands. Women also outnumber men in many professional organizations, including the American Institute of Graphic Arts, where they have done so for 15 years.

Another advance is that female designers are no longer overshadowed by male partners. Tony Dunne and Fiona Raby of Dunne & Raby are treated as equals, as are Nipa Doshi and Jonathan Levien of Doshi Levien. There are also examples of couples working under the woman’s name, rather than the man’s, as Wieki Somers and Dylan van den Berg do at Studio Wieki Somers. A few women designers have even secured influential roles with powerful manufacturers, including Hella Jongerius at Vitra and Patricia Urquiola at Moroso.

But most of the designers who win commissions from those companies are male. The same applies to the AIGA’s highest profile members. The only woman except Ms. Jongerius among the 22 designers or design teams to be listed on Vitra’s Web site for designing its office furniture is Ray Eames, who died in 1988.


Why do so few women reach the top of design? The short answer is the same lack of self-belief and entitlement that dogs them in every other profession, combined with opposition from those who commission the majority of design projects, most of whom are men. The graphic designer Paula Scher once described this as the “Why did I get the woman?” syndrome.

“There’s no question that design has been a boys’ club, I am still often the only female around the table,” said Ilse Crawford, founder of the Studioilse design group and a head tutor at Eindhoven. “As in all professions, it’s the hours you put in during your 30s and 40s that really propel you forward. Design projects run on tight, often changeable timelines. It is not a 9-to-5 job. If women have children and unless they are in super-supportive relationships, they are on the back foot here.”

Such obstacles are as boringly intractable in design as everywhere else. So why are there so many women on Ms. Antonelli’s and my list? Was it solely because, consciously or not, we wanted to support younger women? Possibly, although there are also encouraging signs that female designers may fare better in future.

One is that more women are becoming gatekeepers as they rise to powerful positions in other industries. They may be more open to commissioning female designers, as, in fairness, may the next generation of male gatekeepers.


Another factor is that design is expanding into new areas in response to advances in science and technology and social and economic changes. Historically women have thrived on new turf where there are no male custodians and they are free to invent their own ways of working, as Muriel Cooper did as a pioneer of digital design during the 1970s and 1980s.

As our list is focused on the future, many of our chosen designers work in these fledgling fields. Had we stuck to traditional areas, such as graphics or product design, the gender balance may have been different. Our choices include lots of smart men, but also women, like Neri Oxman and Daisy Ginsberg, who are working on the frontier of design and science, and the pioneering social designers Hilary Cottam and Emily Pilloton.

A defining quality of these new disciplines — and the evolution of older ones — is collaboration, both between individuals and by fusing elements of different fields, something that women tend to do well. “I am personally very inspired by Julia Kristeva and other feminist critical theorists, who are all about creativity at the margins and combining leftover things in different ways,” Ms. Cottam said. “In my case, that’s design, political theory and new forms of business.”

Equally encouraging is that although most of the female designers over the age of 35 with whom I discussed this issue endorsed Ms. Crawford’s “boys’ club” theory (for the record, every male designer looked blank) some younger ones did not.

“I have honestly never consciously felt that being female was an advantage or disadvantage within design,” Ms. Pilloton, 29, said. “Does that make me sound like an unaware spoiled brat reaping the benefits of what former generations endured?” Not necessarily. Isn’t it what her predecessors wanted?

A brief overview of graphic design 23 years ago




In 1994 Adobe released their latest version of Photoshop, Photoshop 3.0, which until 1994 didn't have layers and tabbed pallets. 

Adobe also introduced Illustrator 5.5 - the vector based tool. In 1994 the software was missing gradients, an eye-dropper tool, Wacom tablet support, and the live-trace functions - amongst many features that have since become standard.








If you wanted to surf the net you'd have to do it without Safari, Chrome, Firefox, or even Internet Explorer. None of these browsers had even been developed. 20 years ago, if you wanted to go online you'd have to use the recently announced Netscape Navigator to browse the roughly 10,000 websites that existed.

In the US in 1994 the first ever pizza was ordered too. Even 20 years ago you could order a pizza online through Pizza Huts website!








The notable Fedex logo was developed, the same in which is till used to this day. 







Tuesday 17 October 2017

LORENA HOWARD-SHERIDAN

Lorena Howard-Sheridan is a Mexican-American designer and educator based in Austin, Texas. She majored in Graphic Design in the Universidad Iberoamericana in Mexico City and later went on to acquire a degree in Visual Communication from the Basel School of Design. Lorena is the one of the Principals at Salted Caramel Books, a small publishing house specializing in books for Spanish speaking kids that live in English speaking countries. She is an Adjunct Professor at Centro, a school of design in Mexico City, and a faculty member of the Masters in Graphic Design Program at Vermont College of Fine Arts. Her work has been recognized by Quorum (Mexico), BoNE (Best of New England), and Independent Publisher Awards. She has lectured internationally on the subject of Vernacular Mexican lettering and recently published a beautiful book on the subject titled Sideways Glances.




GDW: HOW DO YOU THINK YOUR UPBRINGING, CULTURAL HERITAGE, AND EDUCATION HAVE IMPACTED YOUR WORK? YOU STUDIED DESIGN BOTH AT THE UNIVERSIDAD IBEROAMERICANA IN MEXICO CITY AND AT THE BASEL SCHOOL OF DESIGN IN SWITZERLAND? HOW WERE THESE EXPERIENCES DIFFERENT? DID ANYTHING STAND OUT IN TERMS OF THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM?


LH-S: Education at my University in Mexico City was effective, for I was able to enter the working field and eventually make a living. College instilled a sense of professional autonomy in me. Unfortunately, the program was weak in terms of instructing the craft of graphic design. We sure had a lot of studio classes, but not enough training in how to do the actual work. I couldn’t tell if my projects were working or not until they were finished (and/or graded)… isn’t that crazy? It’s a common dilemma for our type of profession: we live in a world that rewards assertiveness, so it is easy to oversee that in design you need to be able to work by trial and error and to not know what you are going to make before you make it.

Yet around the 5th semester into my major, I had one single studio class with a Basel School of Design ex-student, and it changed the game for me. It seemed a strange class in comparison to the rest: the projects were simple but ended up looking very professional; things would happen on the paper that I hadn’t thought about before: we were finding ideas, as opposed to having them previously! We worked with simple sketching techniques (photocopies or by hand, no expensive silkscreen or type transfer sheets) until both the concept and the composition were ready. The studio happened through a self-guided process, leaving the guessing part out. We even got to have a say in our grade.






Ten years went by from the time I took that unique course to the day when I finally left for Switzerland, in search for more of that pragmatic education. It was an excellent choice for me. Keep in mind that Basel is a medieval city in central Europe, where this kind of program can’t help but to borrow wisdom from the medieval practice of apprenticeship: the knowledgeable master teaches the trade to the younger, whom will subsequently pass the torch to the coming generations. The Swiss were already frantic with visual research for interactive technologies, so there was a nice combination between tradition and curiosity for the new.

Lots of people talk about their grad school years as a rough time, but for me it was wonderful. I spent three years dedicated exclusively to my work and my friends, and in exchange for nothing: there were no grades, no homework or deadlines until the last year. I learned to look at work as a pleasure; I got trained in that intangible body-mind bond that you can only acquire through the practice. And most importantly, I learned how to postpone the requisite of assertiveness that the professional field values so dearly, and trust in the process.

At the school there were people from many countries and all continents. Most of us were lonely foreigners and our command of German was rather primitive, so we grew very close and would have endless conversations about our cultural backgrounds. We were teaching each other what our—culturally induced—blind spots were. It was then that, by comparison, I could finally see my nationality and others expressed onto graphic work without the interference of stereotypes. Our real differences are way more subtle and intriguing than regional costumes give away; they manifest through abstract properties of the work or in the synthesis of concepts; a simple choice of words for talking about a graphic piece can be revealing. By the way, the US has also had a significant impact in my trajectory. I have had to adjust and adapt to atmospheres permeated by diverse discourses, and trying to figure each one out has been another well of education.







GDW: YOU RECENTLY PUBLISHED YOUR BOOK “SIDEWAYS GLANCES: VERNACULAR MEXICAN LETTERING,” WHAT WERE SOME OF THE THINGS THAT DREW YOU TO FORMALIZE YOUR RESEARCH? CAN YOU TELL US ABOUT YOUR PROCESS CREATING THE WONDERFUL COLLAGES INCLUDED IN THE BOOK?

LH-S: Mexican street lettering became my scholarship subject as I started teaching typography in the US. In all honesty, I picked the subject because I thought American students would enjoy looking at the funky images, but had no idea that I would learn so much from connecting the traditional type assignments to my hometown ice-cream flavor list. Designing the book pushed me to test my own observations, like a spoonful of my own medicine. It was a very introspective process, and helped me reconcile with a part of my “visual upbringing” that I had not been quite able to—consciously, intentionally—connect to as a graphic designer.








GDW: HAVE YOU EVER CONSIDERED DESIGNING TYPE INSPIRED BY MEXICAN LETTERING? DO YOU THINK THAT SYSTEMATIZING SUCH A FREE, ORGANIC FORM OF WRITING WOULD DIMINISH ITS VALUE?

LH-S: All the time! (Although I am more inclined to lettering than typeface design). Writing systems are like species: they evolve and adapt to languages, technologies and individual interventions, while—even if imperceptibly—affecting them all. Street lettering is a very public animal, like a letter-form potluck: typographers, calligraphers and letterers alike draw inspiration from one-another; together we learn and teach each other how to read and write.

BUT YOU MAKE A GOOD OBSERVATION: WILL THE ATTENTION THAT VERNACULAR LETTERING IS GETTING AFFECT THE PRACTICE—AND HOW? WILL IT TURN INTO A SELF-CONSCIOUS TRADE, RUINING ITS SPONTANEITY PERHAPS? THAT HISTORY IS IN MOTION ALREADY. WE’LL NEED TO WAIT AND SEE.




GDW: WHAT CAN YOU SAY ABOUT THE CURRENT STATE OF DESIGN (GRAPHIC DESIGN, MORE SPECIFICALLY) IN LATIN AMERICA? WHO IS DOING REALLY EXCITING, INTERESTING WORK RIGHT NOW? WHAT SHOULD WE BE PAYING ATTENTION TO?

LH-S: I have mixed feelings. Graphic Design was virtually imported as a “first world” profession into Mexico, and—I reckon—into other Latin-American countries as well. And while we have everything we could want for a great design practice (architecture, music, folklore, traditions, an expressive visual culture, etc.), we seem to still be doing a lot of catching-up. Many design programs are mislead by the illusion that graphic design is learned through software courses. In the professional field, the designers’ potential goes to waste while someone of higher rank with no design training (who “knows better”) takes relevant graphic and communication decisions. Of course, this unfortunate practice can happen anywhere, the question is: how much is too much for the general integrity of the profession? As a result, there is a proliferation of dull imitations of—bastardized—international style, overshadowing the cultural effect of better, more genuine approaches.

I believe we owe this situation to a reduced conscience of the purpose and potential of our practice: the expectation is for design to mimic the standards of big international markets, instead of emerging organically from every day life and thorough research. There is little awareness that visual communication is a mirror of society, and as a consequence graphic design becomes cosmetic, sometimes elitist, and sadly misses the chance of being a tool for the well being of all members of a community.

But I am optimistic, because I believe that this situation is gradually and inevitably shifting. The Web and the Internet have brought about some substantial change already, increasing the ranks of the middle class—if not financially, at least intellectually, which is not a small thing. There is access to a lot of information and much of it is retrieved through quality design and communication experiences. The audience is raising the bar as they respond more effectively to better kind of work, and good designers (and their advocates) are listening. It’s everyday more common to learn about design initiatives directed to lower-income communities, and about research based on specific idiosyncrasies. I am putting my money on young people.

Personally, I enjoy and admire the work of Germán Montalvo and Alejandro Magallanes. My opinion is that, each in their own way, accomplishes the task of portraying what I wouldn’t hesitate to call a true Mexican style.


GDW: DO YOU THINK LATIN AMERICAN DESIGN IS WELL REPRESENTED IN THE DESIGN WORLD?


LH-S: We must keep in mind the delicate situation that, if we are expecting—or are expected—to constantly deliver design that looks folkloric, popular, tropical or else in accordance to touristic standards, we will be forever locked outside of a true global community of design. Yet, when a Latin-American designer works successfully for a project and his or her nationality is irrelevant, I find that to be excellent representation of Latin-American design. So my answer is yes.





GDW: AS THIS INTERVIEW WILL ALSO BE PUBLISHED IN A BLOG FOR WOMEN IN GRAPHIC DESIGN, AS A TEACHER, DO YOU FEEL THAT WOMEN ARE EQUALLY REPRESENTED IN GRAPHIC DESIGN EDUCATION? WHAT CHANGES DO YOU SEE OR HOPE TO SEE IN THE FUTURE FOR PROFESSIONAL WOMEN IN GRAPHIC DESIGN CURRICULUM OR IN TERMS OF PROFESSIONAL PRACTICE?

LH-S: When I started college, women were an overwhelming majority among the students of graphic design, while design-related business were mostly owned and/or ran by men. These numbers have been steadily balancing out.

Design has no gender. Yet for all the gender-equality that has not yet been achieved in the professional field, I find that in graphic design something curious tends to happen: women have the slight cultural advantage of not being under too much pressure to make a linear career, so—as long as it is financially feasible—, many set to explore alternative paths to fulfill their vocations. They combine design and art, activism, mind and body health, research, you name it: design can be of service to all fields of life. Especially interesting—from my point of view—is the field of design education, which has proved to be an excellent platform of influence for designer women. There is also a considerable number of marriages between designers, in which one partner takes a heavier load of the business side and the other ventures deeper into education; think for example of Ellen Lupton and Abbott Miller, or Nancy Skolos and Thomas Wedell: the community of design benefits so much from all aspects of their yin-yang-sort-of arrangements.

There are many ways of having a rewarding professional life with or without having an ostensibly successful career. That is the kind of awareness that I would like to see reflected in graphic design curricula: the micro-stories of people that had taken the opportunity to invent their personal version of a professional life. That goes for women and men alike. A way to make Monday a day to look forward.





GDW: YOU ARE ONE OF THE PRINCIPALS AT SALTED CARAMEL BOOKS, A BILINGUAL PUBLISHING HOUSE – WHAT DO YOU LOVE MOST ABOUT YOUR WORK THERE?

LH-S: It is a small company—and new—which gives us room to experiment, stretch the meaning of the word “publishing” and find excuses to dig into our guilty pleasures. Most people don’t realize the insane amount of work and effort that goes into a publication. But there is a stage in every project, when it begins to take a clear shape and become its own entity, revealing an outcome that couldn’t be anticipated; that moment is pure bliss.





APRIL GREIMAN – NEW WAVE DESIGN

April Greiman is an influential contemporary American graphic designer. Her innovative ideas and transmedia projects have taken the world by storm. She is considered one of the first designers to embrace computer technology in a different light, who realized its potential as a design tool. She is recognized for introducing the ‘New Wave’ design style in the US. Greiman is the director of a design consultancy, Made in Space, based in Los Angeles.

Greiman is also credited, along with early collaborator Jayme Odgers, with establishing the ‘New Wave’ design style in the US during the late 70s and early 80s.” Her art combines her Swiss design training with West Coast postmodernism.






Greiman first studied graphic design in her undergraduate education at the Kansas City Art Institute, from 1966–1970. She then went on to study at the Allgemeine Künstgewerberschule Basel, now known as the Basel School of Design (Schule für Gestaltung Basel) in Basel, Switzerland (1970–1971). As a student of Armin Hofmann and Wolfgang Weingart, she was influenced by the International Style and by Weingart’s introduction to the style later known as New Wave, an aesthetic less reliant on Modernist heritage. Her style includes layering type to make it look like it is floating in space, using geometric shapes, exaggerated letter spacing and eccentric colors. She creates a sense of depth by combining graphic elements with photography, which is how she came to work with Jayme Odgers, utilizing Macintosh technology.




During the 1970s, she rejected the belief among many contemporary designers that computers and digitalization would compromise the International Style; instead, she exploited pixelation and other digitization “errors” as integral parts of digital art, a position she has held throughout her career. Once she established herself in New York and Connecticut, she taught at the Philadelphia College of Art.

In 1982, Greiman became head of the design department at the California Institute of the Arts, also known as Cal Arts. She met photographer-artist Jayme Odgers at Cal Arts, who became a significant influence on Greimen. Together, they designed a famous Cal Arts poster in 1977 that became an icon of the California New Wave.






In 1984, she lobbied successfully to change the department name to Visual Communications, as she felt the term “graphic design” would prove too limiting to future designers. In that year, she also became a student herself and investigated in greater depth the effects of technology on her own work. She then returned to full-time practice and acquired her first Macintosh computer. She would later take the Grand Prize in Mac World’s First Macintosh Masters in Art Competition. April also contributed to the design of the 1984 Los Angeles Olympics, by creating a memorable poster of running legs silhouetted against a square of bright blue sky.




An early adopter of this computer, Greiman produced an issue of Design Quarterly in 1986, notable in its development of graphic design. Entitled “Does it make sense?”, the edition was edited by Mildred Friedman and published by the Walker Art Center. She re-imagined the magazine as a poster that folded out to almost three-by-six feet. It contained a life-size, MacVision-generated image of her outstretched naked body adorned with symbolic images and text— a provocative gesture, which emphatically countered the objective, rational and masculine tendencies of modernist design.




In 1995, the U.S. Postal Service launched a stamp designed by Greiman to commemorate the Nineteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution (Women’s Voting Rights).







In 1998 she became an AIGA Medalist. For this story: https://www.aiga.org/medalist-aprilgreiman

In 2007, Greiman completed her largest ever work: a public mural, “Hand Holding a Bowl of Rice,” spanning “seven stories of two building facades marking the entrance to the Wilshire Vermont Metro Station in Los Angeles.”



In 2014, Greiman collaborated with the London based artist-run organisation Auto Italia South East along with a group of designers and artists including Metahaven, in an exhibition POLYMYTH x Miss Information






Greimen has won many awards, including the Medal of the American Institute of Graphic Arts and the Chrysler Award for Innovation. She has also published several books, such as April Greiman: Floating Ideas into Space and “Something from Nothing”.Greiman currently teaches at Woodbury University, School of Architecture and the Southern California Institute of Architecture (SCI-Arc). She is a recipient of the American Institute of Graphic Arts Gold Medal for lifetime achievement. She has received 4 honorary doctorates: Kansas City Art Institute (2001); Lesley University, The Art Institute of Boston (2002); Academy of Art University (2003,) Art Center College of Design (2012.) April Greiman is seen as one of the “ultimate risktakers” for her unorthodox and progressive approach to design by embracing new technologies.






Information sourced from http://www.graphicdesignwomen.com/april-greiman-new-wave-design/

MARIE-LOUISE EKMAN

Marie-Louise Ekman has alternated effortlessly between painting, sculpture, film and drama since the late 1960s. In her works, Ekman exposes the absurdity of everyday life and undermine social constructions, and in rooms decorated with floral wallpaper, people, animals and farting geezers sit at the same table.



Liberation and comic books

Marie-Louise Ekman belongs to a generation of Swedish artists who emerged in the politically turbulent 1960s. Many young artists in the 1960s were deeply influenced by popular culture, and comic books in particular. Ekman made series of silkscreen prints, stitched fishcakes out of shiny, pink silk, built enclosed worlds out of miniature objects, and borrowed the format of comic strips for her own serialised paintings. In her early works, she also appropriated images from The Phantom, Donald Duck and Ernie Bushmiller’s Nancy. Ekman’s protagonists, however, are Minnie and Daisy, together with April, May and June, rather than their male friends.





At Home With a Lady

Ekman’s works have a strong narrative focus. In cramped pictorial spaces with warped one-point perspectives, dreams, passions and disappointments run amok in a heightened reality. In the series At Home With a Lady from 1973, a lonely woman acts out her desires, captive in an interior, like an animal in the zoo, reliving the same reality day after day. In Striptease (1973), this blonde female figure is transformed step-by-step, via ape and man, into a bird that flies away. This is not a sexually charged act of undressing, but a way of stripping off roles and entering and exiting states of mind. In other paintings, windows and sinkholes open up to other worlds. The women’s orifices evolve into exotic landscapes with oceans lined by palm trees, and beyond the windows are other windows, where new wondrous scenes are enacted.




Can a font be feminist?

Interesting article, can be found at: https://www.format.com/magazine/features/design/what-is-typography-feminist-font-definition





It was after attending a typography conference in 1994 that design historian and educator Teal Triggs noticed the lack of women working within the font world. Remembering that moment clearly, she described it to writer Madeleine Morley in “The Women Redressing The Gender Imbalance In Typography”:

“At the end of the day, all the speakers were invited onstage for the last round of applause. It was at that point, when they were all visible in front of us, that we noticed the line-up was all white, middle-class men, many with glasses.”


Not only did that observation lead Triggs to ask where all the women were, but it convinced her and fellow designers Sian Cooke and Liz McQuiston to start WD+RU(The Women’s Design & Research Unit) in response. It’s an initiative that attempts to shine some light on the inequality Triggs saw up there on the stage. WD+RU is only one of many projects aimed at supporting women and their work within the design, and specifically, typography world.

While studying at Beckmans College of Design in Stockholm, art director and photographer Kimberly Ihre also found herself stunned by the lack of information on women while researching typographers. So, like Triggs, Ihre decided to turn her frustration into an opportunity for change, and in 2015, launched the online platform Typequality.


A website where users can share and discover typefaces designed by women, Typequality is an extremely useful design resource, easy to navigate and available for anyone to access. But on top of that, the site is a digital meeting place where women can showcase their work, that of their peers and generally support one another in an overwhelmingly male-dominated industry.
In 2017, the site has grown to include over 170 fonts, with more being added every day. Users can search the site for designs, either by name or by style, learn more about the design’s history and it’s creator, and have the option to purchase and use the design themselves. Hundreds of designers have contributed to the database already, and what started out as a graduation project is fast becoming the leading example of what a fairer, more balanced industry looks like.

Unfortunately, the lack of information that left Ihre wanting and the lack of inclusion of women typographers that Triggs saw, is nothing new. In 2015, in response to yet another public forum dominated by men, Hallmark Cards lettering artist Lila Symonssent out a tweet the read, “I just looked at the main conference schedule for @typeconand barely any women are speaking. Seriously what’s up with that?!”

It is certainly not the lack of female designers that’s the problem. There are not more males attending design college—it’s actually the opposite. There are more female students than male in the top United States art schools. Throughout the industry it is still more common for men to hold leadership roles. The problem of gender inequality seems to be much bigger, and more complicated than it first appears.

In her 2005 essay “Non-existent design: women and the creation of type”, Sibylle Hagmann discusses the history of the trade as one reason for the current situation. It could be, she says, that because printing, lead type design and metalsmithing were traditionally male-dominated professions throughout history, there just isn’t enough non-male experience to feed into the visual language, and the typographic language, that we still use today.

So it seems that the problem is two-fold. Not only is there a lack of females represented in the higher levels of the design world, but also the very system that the design world is built on is too limited in its scope, and non-exclusive by nature. The complexity of the problem is mostly due to our graphic language and it’s symbols—the look of language that we see everyday—reinforces a pre-existing, biased system.







So if a typeface was gender-neutral, what would it look like?

In typography alone, unpacking that system of symbols and how they function is extremely difficult. Everything from the font (or size) to the line length, the ornamentation, the spacing and repetition of the typeface subtly, even subliminally assigns “genders” to a design. Think of the t-shirts you see designed for boys and girls, and the typography they use. “The typographic style for prints aimed at girls are often decorative scripts,” the designers of Queertype T-shirts explain. “While the boys’ prints are set in neutral and bold sans-serif.”

Another project with, interestingly, the same moniker, Queer type is a bold typeface released by Russian designer Yulia Popova, featured on Typequality. As a continuation of her thesis essay “Monstrous Feminine” Popova plays with those genders and personalities we give typography. These letters are thick, colored an almost sickly green, written all-in-caps, and spell out words like “queer’”, “body”, “freak”, “yes”, and “round”.

Some of the fonts on Typequality are politicized, progressive and protest our societal structures; some are simply designed by women typographers who have been pioneers in their fields for years and should be known about.

Sibylle Hagmann’s own award-winning typeface, Odile (released 2006) is available to see and purchase on the site. Wingdings is up there, along with info about its co-creator, the prolific Kris Holmes, who is responsible for over 75 different fonts, including the 1986 Lucida series (the default font for Mac OS X interfaces).

You can find the new version of Lo-Res (the bitmap font that first appeared on early MacIntosh computers over 15 years ago), designed by the luminary Zuzana Licko. Adobe type designer Carol Twombly’s Lithos is also included in the list.

You can also discover WD+RU’s own experimental typeface Pussy Galore. It featuring tongue-in-cheek designs of flippy “dumb blonde” hair, pouting lips and feminine archetypes.

Fonts like these make it clear that not only can typefaces be gender specific, and loaded with stereotypes, but they also have personalities, and condition us from birth to see the world from a particular point of view. But with projects like Typequality, Alphabettes and Women of Graphic Design, the conversation around design and even the limited language it uses, is changing.

Simply by creating a platform and a space that has little to do with the existing structures of the industry (i.e. this exchange is not happening in universities, or at conferences), Ihre, the Typequality site and its contributors are changing the fundamental understanding of our visual language.

Take a peek at designer Nathan Levasseur‘s project inspired by Kimberly Ihre and Typequality. It features six female typographers and their creations.

Practical piece

When thinking about the practical piece in which may encompass the creative report, it is essential that there are clear links between the two. In order to gather my initial thoughts, a mind map was developed.




The general ideas projected focus upon job employability and exposure, as these are the two areas, in which previous research has determined, holds women back from gaining more high role jobs. The idea of developing some form of collective appears interesting, as this may gain attention and help other graphic design students gain employability. Even mentioning that they are part of a collective may entice an employer to hire them. As I developed a catalogue of female design last year, I believe that this may be another possible route, although I would get these publications bound and physically sent to male dominated studios. This hopefully gaining the companies attention, in turn promoting other female designers and not just myself. 



Monday 16 October 2017

Sara De Bondt

Female designer Sara De Bondt in the book How to be a graphic designer without losing your soul by Adrian Shaughnessy. 



“When Grafik magazine ran a profile about my studio, a colleague responded “Ah yes, I heard they were looking for a woman”… I still frequently end up as the only female designer on the bill in design conferences and on juries.

A number of reasons have been invoked to explain the unequal representation of (celebrity) male vs. female graphic designers: from technology (lead typecases were too heavy for women to carry); society (the pay gap in Britain has grown over the last few years); the nature of the profession (late deadlines and last-minute problem-solving does not accommodate family life); to women’s supposed nature (more shy, less competitive, less self-promotional, more “collaborative”).

For me, the only valid reason for this persistent inequality is prejudice, both at the level of individuals and governments…”


Creative bloq


http://www.creativebloq.com/graphic-design/design-still-mans-world-10134975


'Today, over half of all design graduates are female, and the opportunity to combine the many different characteristics of female and male minds sometimes results in dream collaborations. Take NYC-based design firm Sagmeister & Walsh, for example. In 2012, graphic design legend Stefan Sagmeister joined forces with savvy SVA graduate Jessica Walsh, and an unstoppable, award-winning team was born.'


The critical role women play in modern design

http://behindthedesign.represent.uk.com/index.php/the-gender-debate

The general discussion has largely focused on the lack of women in leadership roles, but that issue itself seems likely to be tied to imbalances elsewhere. A survey looking at gender in the advertising industry published by the Institute of Advertising Practitioners in Ireland (IAPI) reported in 2013 that women occupied 80% of all project management roles and 70% of account management, with men in 90% of digital roles and 67% of creative roles.




SARAH TROUNCE
ACCOUNT DIRECTOR

dn&co


Sarah Trounce, who worked as a project manager at YCN and Jane Wentworth Associates before taking her current position as an account director dn&co just over a year ago, is clear that her career thus far has confirmed a female majority in project management. “It’s certainly been my experience that project and studio management roles are dominated by women,” she says.

“I think there’s still a preconception that women are better at looking after the details and supporting or handholding the team that gets things done,” she goes on. “But leadership, being good at both listening and talking, nurturing and growing people’s confidence, managing and challenging expectations, being proactive and always keeping an eye out for new opportunities – these qualities are totally present in both men and women.”


“I worry that some women suffer from a belief that they cannot compete in such a male-dominated industry, and that management is the ‘safer’ option”
Sarah Trounce, account director at dn&co





SAIRAH ASHMAN
GLOBAL CHIEF OPERATING OFFICER

Wolff Olins


“I started at the bottom as a project manager,” says Sairah Ashman, global COO at creative consultancy Wolff Olins, who sees her experience in management as crucial to her success. “I did the spade work in account management, learning from some of the best leaders in the industry over many years – Wally Olins, Brian Boylan, Doug Hamilton, Marina Willer. I think there’s a lot to be said for spending time getting the basics nailed so you have a strong platform to accelerate from.”

That particular roles tend to be slanted toward one sex or the other is something she feels everyone in the industry has noticed at one time or another. “Account management has been quite female historically, while strategy, design and finance has been skewed more towards the guys. There’s no reason for this to be the case as gender is irrelevant to how well a person performs in any of these roles.”


“People tend to recruit in their own image, so it stands to reason that any role dominated by one gender will continue along the same trajectory without some kind of intervention”
Sairah Ashman, global chief operating officer at Wolff Olins



Women in industry-the statistics

Information sourced from http://feminismandgraphicdesign.blogspot.co.uk/2012/03/
Yellow-female Blue-male 













It is evident that when these statistics were taken (2009-2012), there was a clear imbalance in the design industry in which frequently foreshadows women. This includes studios, conference talks, exhibitions, awards, judges and award winners. The reasoning behind this is unknown and thus it is essential that this information is gathered in order to ensure that myself and female peers have the same opportunities as our male peers. 

Saturday 14 October 2017

COP dissertation presentation

Although I am still unsure upon my dissertation question, a presentation was developed in which outlines my thoughts surrounding the project so far. When completing initial research it became apparent to myself that women lack in the design industry, and that it is still an industry lead by males. When thinking about why this could be, it came to myself that maybe employers have some reservations about employing women. As a result of this it was decided to gain information surrounding the amount of women initially introduced to industry compared to men. Other key questions were outlined, including the key question. Does male and female design differ?

Dissertation research- Books

Dissertation Research-Books


Women in graphic Design 1890-2012 Frauen Und Grefik-Design (Gerda Breuer, Julia Meer (ED./HG.)

(65) ‘For many reasons, which are also linked to historical processes, women are only marginally represented in the field of graphic design. Nevertheless, a number of female designers made important contributions to a history of poster design that takes no account of gender differences.’

(67) ‘In 1853, The New York Times ran a brief article applauding the establishment of The Ladies Paper, a publication that employed women to create the ‘typography’ of its pages. The journal’s business management and editorial content remained safely in the care of men, while the ‘merely mechanical routine’ of typesetting was delegated to women. Praising this arrangement, the writer explained that giving women opportunities for employment would improve their lot far more than arguing about lofty concepts of ‘Women's Rights’ or the ‘intellectual equality’ of the sexes.’

Continued…

(67) ‘Graphic design is a mode of art, a form of discourse, and a contribution to the broader sphere of culture. For the vast majority of designers. For the mass majority of designers, however graphic design first and foremost an economic activity. Design has offered women a decent means of support since the nineteenth century, and it continues to do so today. In the United States (USA), tens of thousands of women find employment at every level of the field, from a stay-at-home pieceworker to a production artist to independent entrepreneur to creative director.’

(69) ‘A book is a physical artifact and a medium of communication. Today, women are among the most influential designers of American books, having forged key paradigms in the exterior packaging and internal architecture of jacket and page.’

Continued…

(69) ‘The printing trades has provided employment for women during the nineteenth century, especially as typesetters, although they were subject, as in other trades, to lower pay for equal work.’

(73) ‘Several women were leaders in the postmodern return to the historical styles that reshaped the top level of commercial book cover and jacket design in the 1980’s. Working in New York, designer Louise Fili literally changed the surface of mainstream publishing, rejecting the shiny finishes and garnish foil-stamping that served as a standard packaging for mass-market books. Fili’s designs for pantheon used matte, laminated coatings to create mysteriously soft yet durable, high plasticized surfaces. Her cover for Marguerite Duras’s The Lover (1983) was a lasting icon.’

(75) ‘Magazine publishing is another field where women have found opportunities to thrive. While names such as Grace Mirabella (Mirabella), Tina Brown (Vanity Fair, The New Yorker, and The Daily Beast), and Anna Wintour (Vogue) have figured high on the mastheads of great magazines, women’s roles as art directors and designers have been less prominent.’

(77) ‘Although few women achieved the status of magazine art director in the 1940s and 1950s, some filled other executive positions. Estelle Ellis, a colleague and collaborator of Pineles, became promotion director of Charm, the ‘magazine for women who work’ 1944. She had also worked with Pineless on the marketing of Severn Charting women’s spending on shoes, stockings, cosmetics and other high-status items worn in the office.’

Continued…

(77) ‘Since then, several women have served as chief designers for major magazines. Bea Feitler was art director of Harper’s Bazaar, Ms., and Rolling Stone during the 1960’s and 1970s. Rhonda Rubinstein has worked since the late 1980’s as an art director at Esquire, Mother Jones, and other publications.’

(78) ‘A book or magazine is an inward volume of pages reflecting out on the world of events and ideas. Designers use words and images to directly engage the physical environment as well.’

(78) ‘Suffrage (the right to vote)was the central issue for for feminism in the early twentieth century. As art historian Paula Harper has pointed out, the suffrage posters of the 1910s (as opposed to cartoons and other graphic work) tended to be conservative in their rhetoric and visual style.’

Continued...

(78) ‘the suffragists of the 1910s pleaded their cause by suggesting that the woman’s vote would strengthen rather than destroy the existing family-based culture’.

(78) ‘Feminism's second wave unfolded within and sometimes against the anti-Establishment freedoms promoted by these movements. Posters, buttons, and bumper stickers, carrying such slogans as ‘Women’s Liberation is the Revolution’ and ‘Women are not chicks’ suggest that feminism was its own battle within the broader counterculture’.

(78-80) ‘Few women designers have willingly used the ‘f-word’, fearful, perhaps, of alienating their colleagues or of casting doubt on the legitimacy of their own success. De Bretteville articulated a set of design strategies in the early 1980s that reflected the feminist principles, such as the attempt to represent a subject from multiple perspectives, to allow viewers to complete the meaning of a communication. Such strategies coincided with the theories of experimental typography and postmodernism that were emerging around the same time’  

(80-81) ‘Paula Scher creates institutional identities that merge with the built environment. In 1991, Scher became the sole woman among over a dozen partners in the international design firm Pentagram, making what she has called, ‘the only girl in the football team’. That doesn’t make her a cheerleader or a trophy date, but an equal player in a pack of heavyweights. Pentagram brought Scher a level of visibility and cultural clout virtually unattainable to a woman working on her own, while in turn, her fresh, energetic approach earned new recognition for Pentagram, a venerable company whose reputation had begun to level off.’

Continued...

(81) ‘Scher’s work for clients ranging from museums to global corporations has grown increasingly environmental, encompassing banners, building signs, and urban advertising campaigns. In 1994, she conceived a total design program for the New York’s Public Theatre that ranges from billboards, street signs, and lobby interiors to logos, tickets, and stationary. Scher used a rhythmic mix of sans serif letterforms, drawn from the American printer’s vernacular, to construct a visual vocabulary that is both diverse and coherent-like the theatre’s programming. Many of her posters combine evocative images with dramatic typography to reflect the spirit of the production, rather than showcasing individual stars.’

(81) ‘During the last quarter of the twentieth century, women played a central role in building the discourse of graphic design. During this period, the profession came of age both as a recognized business and as a field of study in university art and design programmes, including at the graduate level. Women were no minority among the educators, critics, editors, and curators who defined the theoretical issues of the time. Schools and museums provided accessible platforms from which women could influence the direction of graphic design.’

(85) ‘Women played important roles in the evolution of graphic design across the last century and into the new one. From the revaluation of the book spurred by the Arts and Craft movement to the extension of typography beyond the printed page, women have opportunities to create work of beauty and significance, shaping the field of graphic design and as well the broader culture.’

Continued…

(85) ‘Yet despite the fantastic successes documented here, women remain minority players. It is striking how many successful women designers in the twentieth century worked in partnership with powerful male practitioners. Such connections to establish power are not inconsequential. It is easy for young designers today to discount the importance of the pioneering women who entered a less open field; it also is easy to assume that the balance of male and female students in schools of art and design insures an equal balance in the workplace. Although women represent a large part of the design profession, they still do not predominate at the very top, in terms of income or access to large-scale commissions.’

Continued...

(85) ‘The idea that women’s place is safely guaranteed and that self-assertion is neither attractive nor necessary could provide false comfort to young women working in design-or any other field-today. Although graphic design is a profession that women helped to shape, there remains ample room for expanding our opportunities. May the next generation of women designers stake out new territories in the changing landscape of media and communication.’


Why Men hate Women- Adam Jukes-Free association books-London-1993

(xxiii) ‘Masculinity is predicated on the assumption of male superiority. Sexism seems to be a function of gender division or differentiation; therefore one is to some extent, trapped in attempting to account for this.’

(9) ‘One of the major theoretical planks of feminist thinking is that of the patriarchy, the institutionalization of masculine dominance, persists and thrives precisely because men have always assumed responsibility for defining the world and, in doing so, have taken possession of it’.

(45) ‘Mothering has been defined as a functional relationship with the infant rather than a biological gender role which is exclusive to the biological mother. This is a basis for optimism for those who hold to the constructionist or cultural theory of male dominance or-as I call it, misogyny.

(105) ‘Misogyny is a universal phenomenon. All women fall victim to it and all men, to a greater or lesser degree, inflict it on them’

The Dialectic of sex- the case for feminist revolution-Shulamith Firestone-William morrow and company, inc. 1970.

(4) ‘Feminists have to question, not just of all Western culture, but the organization of nature. Many women give up in despair:if that’s how deep it goes they don’t want to know. Others continue strengthening and enlarging the movement, their painful sensitivity to female oppression existing for a purpose: eventually to eliminate it’.

(10) ‘The theory of historical materialism has brought to light some important truths. Humanity is not an animal species, it is a historical reality. Human society is is an antiphysis- in a sense it is against nature; it does not passively submit to the presence of nature but rather takes over the control of nature on its own behalf. This arrogation is not an inward, subjective operation; it is accomplished objectivity in practical action.’

Continued…

(10) ‘Thus the ‘natural’ is not necessarily a ‘human’ value. Humanity has begun to transcend Nature: we can no longer justify the maintenance of a discriminatory sex class system on the grounds of its origins in nature.’
Continued…

(10) ‘The problem becomes political, demanding more than a comprehensive historical analysis, when one realises that, though man is increasingly capable of freeing himself from the biological conditions that created his tyranny over women and children, he has little reason to want to give this tyranny up.’

(11) ‘And just as the end goal of the socialist revolution was not was not only the elimination of the economic class privilege but of the economic class distinction itself, so the end goal of feminist revolution must be, unlike that of the first feminist movement, not just the elimination of male privilege but of the sex distinction itself: genital differences between human beings would no longer matter culturally.

(15) ‘In the radical feminist view, the new feminism is not just the revival of a serious political movement for social equality. It is the second wave for the most important revolution in history. Its aim: overthrow of the oldest, most rigid class/caste system in existence, the class system based on sex- a system consolidated over thousands of years, lending the archetypal male and female roles an undeserved legitimacy and seeming permanence.

Continued…

(15) ‘the dawn of sa long struggle to break free from the oppressive power structures set up by nature and reinforced by man.’
(15) ‘witches must be seen as women in independent political revolt: within two centuries eight million women were burned at the stake by the church-for religion was the politics of that period’

(18) ‘One may divide the women in the women's movement into two groups: the Feminists and the reformers who are not in the least Feminists; who do not care a tuppence about equality for itself.’

(20) ‘On one hand, feminism had been constricted to the single issue of the vote-the WRM and (temporarily) transformed into a suffrage movement- and on the other, women’s energies were diffused into any other radical cause but their own’

(29) ‘The cultural indoctrinations necessary to reinforce sex role traditions had become blatant, tasteless, where before they had been insidious.’

(29) ‘In the historical interpretation we have espoused, feminism is the inevitable female response to the development of a technology capable of freeing women from the tyranny of their sexual-reproductive roles- both the fundamental biological condition itself, and the sexual class system built upon, and reinforcing, this biological condition. The increasing development of science in the twentieth century should have only accelerated the initial feminist reaction to the Industrial Revolution. (Fertility control alone, for example, a problem for which the early feminists had no answer.’

(140) ‘Representation of the world, like the world itself, is the work of men; they describe it from their point of view, which they confuse with the absolute truth’ -Simone de Beauvoir

(140) ‘The muse is female. Men of culture were emotionally warped by the sublimation process; they converted life to art, thus could not live it.’

Continued…

(140) ‘That women were intrinsic in the very content of culture is borne out by an example from the history of art: men are erotically stimulated by the opposite sex; painting was male; the nude became the female nude’

(141) ‘But what about the women who have contributed directly to culture? There aren't many. And in those cases where individual women have participated in male culture, they have had to do so on male terms. And it shows. Because they have had to comprove themselves in their old female roles, a role at odds with their self-appointed ambitions- it is not surprisingly that they are seldom as skilled as men at the game of culture’

(142) ‘female vision of an exclusively male culture’

(143) ‘It would take a denial of all cultural tradition for women to produce even a true ‘female’ art. For a woman who participates in (male) culture must achieve and be rated by standards of a tradition she had no part in making- and certainly there is no room in that tradition for a female view, even if she could discover what it is.

(148) ‘The sex role system divides human experience; men and women live in these different halves of reality; and culture reflects this.’

Feminisms is still our name-Seven essay on historiography and curatorial practices- Edited Malin Hedlin Hayden and Jessica Sjoholm Skrubbe- Cambridge Scholars Publishing

(14) ‘While to a greater or lesser extent academic institutions, and universities and community art galleries have sponsored and supported feminist work in and on the visual arts (from studio practice to feminist art history) since the rise of the feminist art movement, it is only in the past few years that the commercial arms of the art world are seemingly obsessively interested in historical and contemporary feminist art.’

(15) ‘...perhaps this current interest [in feminism in the art world]...has to do with the daughters and sons of the movement coming of age-especially the daughters, particularly in the West. These are women who have experienced a feminist-informed system of education and now reached positions of power; women who are able not just to look back make connections and reappraise but also to green-light the exhibitions and projects that explore these very themes’

(57) ‘Few artists, scholars of art history, art critics, and curators would today claim essentialist biological criteria as the ideological foundation of their practices.’

(57/58) ‘I prefer to think of the art world as a gender-biased system, an ideologically charged system (even if biology hence sex are notions circumscribed by ideology too). Then, discrimination of e.g women artists are rather to be dismantled by analysis of culture, aesthetic, political, economic, and social power structures and valuations rather than to think and argue from a position that claims that women, artists or not, are essentially different from men (artists).

(58/59) ‘Art shows and publications that include more than one artist yet only male artists are often immediately attacked for their withholding discriminatory strategies. But when shows and publications only include women artists there are rarely any objections at all. Singling out women artists as a particular group with common interests and experiences has of course been a necessary strategy to make women artists visible in the first place.’

(65) ‘Refusing to practice an idea that these two sex and, here, gender categories are possibly equal regarding skills and critical capabilities, seems to me to practice (strategic) essentialism as a mode of self-othering, which seems to be a form of reversing the strategic per se.’

Women of Consequences, heroines who shaped the world- Xaviere Gauthier- Flammarion, S.A., Paris, 2010

191 ‘The woman of genius does not exist; when she exists, she is man’ - Octave Uzanne

192 ‘women are faced with the stark choice between creating and procreating’.

194 ‘The progress made since the early twentieth century is palpable.’

194 ‘To gain acceptance in the male worlds of literature, music, or art, women have often found it advantageous to disemble a femininity liable to sabotage their efforts’.

195 ‘I find that, in striving to be the equals of men, women are being overmodest, [and,] in wanting to imitate men, who, let us not forget, are encumbered by an out-of-date civilization, they do little more than pay them homage’.

Key concepts in Feminist Theory and Research- Christina Hughes-SAGE Publications-2002

(33) ‘In the UK it is just over three decades ago that the Equal Pay Act (1970) was passed and over a quarter of a century ago that the Sex Discrimination Act (1975) was passed. Despite these changes, parity with men in all of these arenas is yet to be achieved. And, internationally, it should be remembered that such a legislation is not a global phenomenon.’

(34) ‘For example, the assumption that equality means ‘the same’ has been explored in terms of its political and philosophical implications. The notion that women should view the masculine as the normative, that is as the goal to be achieved, is certainly not one that is ascribed to all feminists’.

(35) ‘Feminist history tells us of the significant campaigns that have been undertaken to enable women to vote, to give them access to higher education and to equal pay and conditions in the workplace. The fundamental basis of these campaigns has been the argument that, as human beings, women are the same as men. Women therefore have a right to equal treatment.’

Continued…

(35/36) ‘They are also equally entitled to the same pay for the same work and the same levels of access to education’ (Phillips, 1987; Evans, 1995.

(36) ‘Moreover, the notion of equality as a universal concept, that is a set of rules, norms and principles that are equally applicable to everyone and can be recognized and acceptable to everyone, appears at first sight to be an attractive concept for feminism.’

(36) ‘Thornton (1986) notes that there are three elements to this standard argument for sex equality. These are: women’s nature; the social treatment of women; and women’s performance.’

(36) ‘Equality is a concept that can only be applied to two (or more) things in some specified respect. There has to be characteristics which both have in respect of which they are said to be equal’. (Thornton, 1986:77, emphasis in original).


(37) When we turn to the programmatic elements of equal treatment, further problems arise. For example, does equal treatment mean identical treatment?’


As these book quotes largely focus upon contextual graphic design, it is essential that I gain sources in which inform about contemporary design, as this is most relevant to my practice.